NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 15, 2023

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Evercore Inc. will be conducted online only, via live webcast, on June 15, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. There will be no physical location for shareholders to attend. Shareholders may only participate online by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/EVR2023.

We will also act on any other business as may properly come before our Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 21, 2023 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at our Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of that meeting.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU CAREFULLY READ YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE.

VIA THE INTERNET Visit the website listed on your proxy card or Notice

BY TELEPHONE Call the telephone number listed on your proxy card

LIVE WEBCAST Participate in the annual meeting (see page 13 for more information)

BY MAIL Request printed proxy materials and mail in a completed proxy card

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CEO

April 28, 2023

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we cordially invite you to our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held online, via live webcast only, on Thursday, June 15, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. This proxy statement describes Evercore’s 2022 accomplishments, compensation practices and governance highlights for your consideration in connection with the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

The past year was a complex and challenging environment. As we reflect on this past year, we feel extremely proud that in such an environment, we were able to effectively serve our clients while also investing in our business, as we delivered solid financial results for our shareholders. In fact, 2022 was our second-best year on record, as we achieved approximately $2.8 billion in net revenue and delivered strong net income and earnings per share results. Our Advisory revenues of approximately $2.4 billion similarly were our second-best, and our Equities business yet again delivered over $200 million in commissions and related revenues. Our underwriting business continued to progress despite a challenging economic environment. We are proud to have served as bookrunners on all equity and equity-linked underwriting transactions in which we participated, including involvement in four of the five largest U.S. initial public offerings. And finally, while the global market declines impacted our clients’ portfolios and our assets under management for the year, our wealth management business continues to report strong long-term performance and strong client retention.

In 2022, we continued to strengthen our commitment to our sustainability efforts and further drive our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. DE&I remains a top priority, and we have maintained our focus on being one of the top places to work for the most talented and diverse professionals in the industry. We will continue to take meaningful action when it comes to DE&I and provide updates on our progress in our forthcoming 2023 sustainability report, which builds on our 2022 Sustainability Report.

In the short time since its formation in 2021, the Evercore Foundation has contributed to several organizations which advance its mission of supporting education, mental health and critical social services for children and underrepresented groups in the communities in which we live and work. We are acutely aware of the importance of good corporate citizenship and the continued integration of sustainability considerations into our business model.

At this year’s Annual Meeting, you will be asked to vote on several items, including the election of our directors and our executive compensation program. We engage extensively with our shareholders on an ongoing basis and welcome feedback regarding our performance, corporate governance, compensation and sustainability practices and other matters of interest to our shareholders. We encourage you to read the proxy statement carefully for more information. Your vote is important to us, and we hope that you will participate in the Annual Meeting and vote as promptly as possible through any of the means described in this proxy statement. Instructions on how to vote begin on page 7. Thank you for your continued support of Evercore.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ii

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information and is intended to assist you in reviewing the proposals. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly.

In this Proxy Statement, unless the context requires otherwise, the “Company” or “Evercore” refers to Evercore Inc. and “we,” “us” or “our” all refer to Evercore and its subsidiaries. For ease of reference, we have included definitions of the abbreviations, capitalized terms and other terms frequently used in this Proxy Statement in the Glossary of Key Defined Terms beginning on page 73.

2023 Annual Meeting Information

Additional information about our Annual Meeting, including details about how to participate in our Annual Meeting online and how to submit questions and cast your votes, is provided under “Why did the Board decide to adopt a virtual format for the Annual Meeting?” on page 13 of the Proxy Statement and “What do I need to do if I want to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting?” on page 13 of the Proxy Statement.

Matters to be Voted on at our 2023 Annual Meeting

We highly value the faith that our investors have placed in us and take seriously our obligations as fiduciaries. 2022 was a solid year for Evercore and our investors. Despite significant volatility and macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds, we were able to serve our clients and strategically invest in our business, while delivering results for our shareholders. In fact, we achieved the second best full year revenue, net income and earnings per share results, on both a U.S. GAAP and Adjusted basis, in our history.

1

Our long-standing pay-for-performance compensation program is designed to reward performance and align the long-term interests of our executives and professionals with those of our shareholders. As discussed throughout our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 36 of this proxy statement, in determining NEO compensation for 2022, our Compensation Committee considered, among other strategic accomplishments, the solid financial results achieved by the Company in 2022, the accomplishment of the Company’s capital return and strategic objectives, and the promotion of and adherence to our Core Values, including as they relate to our sustainability and to our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, while giving appropriate consideration to our operating results. The following summarizes our 2022 financial performance as considered by the Compensation Committee in making NEO compensation determinations, and also highlights key components of our executive compensation program, each as discussed in more detail in Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 36 of this proxy statement.

* Adjusted Net Revenues and Adjusted Earnings Per Share are non-GAAP measures. Adjusted EPS includes a benefit to Net Income of approximately $20.2 million for FY 2022, $19.5 million for FY 2021, $13.2 million for 2019, and $24.2 million for FY 2018, respectively, and includes an expense of approximately $0.02 million for 2020 from the application of the new accounting standard for income taxes related to share-based compensation. See Annex A for further information and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP amounts.

Returned $655.0 million to shareholders during 2022 through dividends and share/LP unit repurchases*

* Includes dividends to Class A shareholders and equivalent amounts distributed to holders of LP units. Totals may not add due to rounding.

2

Our TSR continues to demonstrate the long-term positive growth in our share price*

* Peer Group includes Moelis & Company, Houlihan Lokey, PJT Partners, Lazard and Greenhill. TSR is calculated 12/31 to 12/31, assuming reinvestment of dividends. Equal weighted index methodology.

3

4

The following are highlights of our governance and leadership practices that are discussed further under herein under “Corporate Governance” and “Director Compensation” on pages 27 and 34, respectively.

5

6

GENERAL INFORMATION

Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement?

The Board is soliciting proxies for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and we will bear the cost of this solicitation. You are receiving a Proxy Statement because you owned shares of our Class A common stock and/or our Class B common stock as of the close of business on April 21, 2023, the record date. Your ownership of shares on that date entitles you to vote at our Annual Meeting. By following the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) or, if you received printed proxy materials, using the attached proxy card or voting instruction card from your broker or other intermediary, you are able to vote whether or not you participate in our Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement describes the matters on which we would like you to vote and provides information on those matters so that you can make an informed decision when you do vote.

How are the proxy materials being distributed?

To expedite delivery, reduce costs and improve our environmental impact, we used “Notice and Access” in accordance with an SEC rule that allows us to provide proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet. By May 5, 2023, we will have sent a Notice to certain shareholders including instructions on how to access our proxy materials online. If you received a Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Notice also explains how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. If you received a Notice and would like to receive a copy of our proxy materials, follow the instructions contained in the Notice to request a copy electronically or in paper form on a one-time or ongoing basis. Shareholders who do not receive the Notice will continue to receive either a paper or electronic copy of the proxy statement, which will be sent on or about April 28, 2023.

What will I be voting on?

You will be voting:

What are the Board’s recommendations?

Our Board recommends:

7

How do I vote?

You can vote either at our virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy without participating in our Annual Meeting. To vote by proxy you may vote by telephone, on the internet or through the mail as follows, which instructions are also set forth on your Notice or, if you received printed proxy materials, your proxy card:

We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to participate in our Annual Meeting so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for us to hold the Annual Meeting and so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to participate in the Annual Meeting. If you received printed proxy materials and are voting by mail, you should follow the instructions set forth on the proxy card, being sure to complete it, to sign and date it and to mail it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you participate in the Annual Meeting, you may vote at the meeting as described herein and your previously delivered proxy will not be counted.

If your shares are held through a bank, broker or other holder of record (that is, in “street name”), please refer to the information forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see what you must do in order to vote your shares. If you want to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record and have it at the meeting. Please also see the information under “—What do I need to do if I want to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting?” on page 13.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner or street name holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Shareowner Services LLC, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “shareholder of record.” We have sent the Notice or, if you received printed proxy materials, your notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, Annual Report and proxy card directly to you.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, broker or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. The notice of the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement, the Annual Report and a voting instruction card have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record on how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card included in the mailing or by following their instructions for voting.

8

What is included in the proxy materials?

Our proxy materials, which are available on our website at www.evercore.com under the “Resources” tab of the “For Investors” link, include our Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Report to shareholders. If you received printed versions of these materials by mail (rather than through electronic delivery), these materials also included a proxy card or voting instruction form.

What type of financial information is used in this Proxy Statement?

The Evercore financial measures in this Proxy Statement are those prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, unless they are designated as “non-GAAP measures,” in which case a reconciliation to the U.S. GAAP numbers is included in Annex A.

How does Evercore’s corporate structure impact Evercore’s share count and vote calculation?

The diagram on page 10 depicts our organizational structure. Our structure is similar to an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT structure, which is common in the real estate sector and with human capital-intensive businesses which have gone public.

Certain of our SMDs and other individuals and entities hold some of their equity in limited partnership units and interests issued by Evercore LP, a Delaware limited partnership. These include Class A units, Class E units, Class I units, Class K units and Class K-P units (which may convert into Class K units) in Evercore LP.

Class A, Class E, Class I and Class K units of Evercore LP are exchangeable, at the discretion of the unit holder and without the payment of any consideration, on a one-for-one basis for shares of our Class A common stock, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications.

The Class K-P units generally convert, on specified vesting dates, into a number of Class K units, contingent upon the achievement of certain defined benchmark results and subject to the participant’s continued service with the Company (which Class K units will, in turn, be exchangeable for Class A common stock as noted above). The performance conditions applicable to a portion of the outstanding Class K-P units have been achieved.

Generally, all holders of Class A units, Class E units, Class I units and Class K units (collectively, “Voting Units”), other than the Company, have the same voting rights as holders of Class A common shareholders through the ownership of our Class B common stock, which entitles each holder to one vote for each unit held by such holder. Holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters presented to our shareholders for their vote or approval, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

The Class B common stock has no economic rights. The Company funds dividends to holders of our Class A common stock by causing Evercore LP to make distributions to its partners, including the Company. Evercore LP makes pro-rata distributions to its partners based on their interest in Evercore LP concurrently with Evercore LP distributions to the Company (provided that holders of Class K-P units are not entitled to regular or extraordinary distributions).

Thus, holders of Voting Units, through the combination of Class B common stock of Evercore and LP units, generally have similar equity interests as if they held an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock.

Because of our corporate structure, we view our share count as including Voting Units for voting purposes, and include these units when we calculate total shares and share equivalents for voting

9

purposes. Unless indicated otherwise, where we use the terms voting power, votes outstanding, votes cast or other similar terms, such terms should be read to include both the number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding and the number of votes associated with Class B common stock, which is generally equal to the number of Voting Units. As of April 21, 2023, the record date for our Annual Meeting, a combined total of 41,166,363 shares of Class A common stock and Voting Units (by virtue of the associated Class B common stock) are entitled to vote.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

What is our voting share count?

As of April 21, 2023, the record date for our Annual Meeting, our voting share count was as follows:

What constitutes a quorum?

The holders of a majority of voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock (which is equal to the number of Voting Units) entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by broker non-votes (as defined below) also are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. However, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other holder of record, under current NYSE rules, Proposals 1 and 2 are considered non-discretionary matters and a bank, broker or other holder of record will lack the authority to vote shares at his or her discretion on these proposals, and your shares will not be voted on these proposals (a “broker non-vote”).

10

How are votes calculated?

If you are a holder of our Class A common stock, then you are entitled to one vote at our Annual Meeting for each share of our Class A common stock that you held as of the close of business on April 21, 2023.

If you are a holder of our Class B common stock, then you are entitled to a number of votes at our Annual Meeting equal to the total number of Voting Units in Evercore LP that you held as of the close of business on April 21, 2023.

If you hold RSUs, you will not be entitled to vote the shares underlying such RSUs until you actually receive delivery of the shares of Class A common stock underlying such units.

All matters on the agenda for our Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof will be voted on by the holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, voting together as a single class.

How many votes are required to approve each PROPOSAL and how are votes counted?

It is important to note that the proposals with respect to (i) approval of the compensation of our NEOs and (ii) ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm are non-binding and advisory. However, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of Proposal 2 in making future compensation decisions and, if our shareholders fail to ratify the selection of Deloitte, the selection of another independent registered public accounting firm may be considered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

11

What happens if a director fails to receive the support of a majority of votes cast?

Under our director resignation policy, if a director receives more “withhold” votes than “for” votes, then that director must promptly tender his or her resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation offer (without the participation of the relevant director) and will recommend to the Board the action to be taken, and the Board will take action within 90 days following certification of the vote, and publicly disclose its decision and the reason therefor. See “PROPOSAL 1—Election of Directors—Majority Voting Policy” below on page 20.

What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

Shareholders should specify their choice for each matter on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card. If no specific instructions are given, proxy cards and voting instruction cards which are signed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof as indicated in the chart above. In addition, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect to other matters that may properly come before our Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting in accordance with their judgment.

Can I change my vote?

Yes. At any time before your proxy is exercised at the Annual Meeting, you may change your vote by:

If your shares are held in street name, please refer to the information forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other holder of record for procedures on revoking or changing your vote.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or Notice?

If you receive more than one proxy card or Notice, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please follow the instructions included on each Notice you receive or, if you received printed proxy materials by mail, complete, sign and return each proxy card you receive.

What happens if a nominee for director declines or is unable to accept election?

If you vote in the manner described in the Notice or by signing the proxy card or voting instruction card, and if unforeseen circumstances make it necessary for our Board to substitute another person for a nominee, the proxies named in the proxy card or voting instruction card will vote your shares for that other person.

Will anyone contact me regarding this vote?

In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers or employees in person, by telephone or by other means of communication, for which no additional compensation will be paid. We have also engaged Alliance Advisors LLC (“Alliance”) to assist in the solicitation and distribution of proxies. Alliance will receive fees of approximately $60,000, plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs

12

and expenses, for its services. Brokerage houses, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting materials to beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Why did the Board decide to adopt a virtual format for the Annual Meeting?

Following consideration of the successful implementation of the virtual format for the annual meetings held in recent years, the Board has determined it would be advisable to continue to hold our annual meeting virtually. We believe the virtual format will provide a productive opportunity for shareholders to communicate with the Board by submitting questions. In addition, the online meeting format will eliminate many of the costs associated with holding a physical meeting.

What do I need to do if I want to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting?

As discussed above, our Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted only via live webcast. There will be no physical meeting location. All holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock, including shareholders of record and shareholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers or other holders of record, may participate in the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders as of the record date can vote at the Annual Meeting.

If you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/EVR2023 and enter the 16-digit control number included either on your Notice, proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may begin to log into the meeting platform at 8:45 a.m., Eastern Time, on June 15, 2023. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on June 15, 2023. Participants should ensure they have a strong internet connection and suitable devices wherever they intend to participate in the Annual Meeting, and should give themselves time to log in and ensure they can hear and stream audio prior to the start of the Annual Meeting.

If you wish to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/EVR2023, type your question into the ‘‘Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.”

Questions pertinent to Annual Meeting matters will be answered during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints. Questions regarding personal matters, including those related to employment, product or service issues, are not pertinent to Annual Meeting matters and therefore will not be answered. Any questions pertinent to Annual Meeting matters that cannot be answered during the meeting due to time constraints will be posted online and answered at www.evercore.com. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, we will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during check-in, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting platform log-in page.

In fairness to all shareholders and participants at the meeting, and in the interest of an orderly and constructive meeting, rules of conduct will be enforced. Copies of these rules will be available at the meeting. Only shareholders or their valid proxy holders may address the meeting. Depending on the number of shareholders who wish to speak, we cannot ensure that every such shareholder will be able to do so or will be able to do so for as long as they might want to hold the floor.

Only proposals that meet the requirements of our Amended and Restated Bylaws will be eligible for consideration at the meeting. This year there are no shareholder proposals that meet the criteria. Therefore, no shareholder proposals will be considered during the Annual Meeting. Shareholders may submit proposals and other matters for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting as described in “Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for 2024 Annual Meeting” on page 72.

13

Is a list of shareholders available?

The names of shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available to shareholders at least 10 days prior to our Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices located at 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055 during normal business hours, and at the Annual Meeting. The list will also be available to shareholders at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/EVR2023 during the Annual Meeting.

How do I find out the voting results?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting, and final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

When is our fiscal year?

Our fiscal year ends on December 31 of each year. Our 2022 fiscal year was from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Our 2023 fiscal year will be from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.

Will I receive a copy of the Annual Report?

If you did not receive a Notice, you will receive our 2022 Annual Report with the Proxy Statement. If you did receive a Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the 2022 Annual Report or other proxy materials, unless you have requested a copy by following the instructions contained in the Notice. The Annual Report includes our audited financial statements, along with other financial information about us, which we urge you to read carefully.

Where can I find more financial information about Evercore?

You can obtain, free of charge, a copy of our filings with the SEC by:

You can also obtain a copy of our SEC filings from the SEC’s EDGAR database at www.sec.gov.

How can I contact our Corporate Secretary?

In several sections of this Proxy Statement, we suggest that you should contact our Corporate Secretary to follow up on various items. You can reach our Corporate Secretary by writing to the Corporate Secretary Department at our principal offices located at 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

14

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws provides that our Board will consist of that number of directors determined from time to time by our Board. Acting upon the recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board has nominated 11 persons identified herein for election as directors, all of whom are directors currently, to hold office until the 2024 Annual Meeting or until the election and qualification of their successors. Our nominees include 9 independent directors.

Set forth below are the names of the nominees for election as our directors; their ages and principal occupations as of April 21, 2023; and their biographical information.

Roger C. Altman, Founder, Senior Chairman and Director, formed Evercore in 1995, served as our CEO until May 2009 and remains an executive officer of Evercore. From May 2009 to November 2016, Mr. Altman served as our Executive Chairman. Mr. Altman began his investment banking career at Lehman Brothers and became a general partner of that firm in 1974. Beginning in 1977, he served as Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for four years. He then returned to Lehman Brothers, later becoming co-head of overall investment banking, a member of the firm’s management committee and its board. He remained in those positions until the firm was sold. In 1987, Mr. Altman joined The Blackstone Group as vice chairman, head of its merger and acquisition advisory business and a member of its investment committee. Mr. Altman also had primary responsibility for Blackstone’s international business. Beginning in January 1993, Mr. Altman returned to Washington to serve as Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for two years.

Mr. Altman is a Trustee of MIT and is a Trustee of New York Presbyterian Hospital, serving on its Finance Committee. He is a Director of New Visions for Public Schools and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He received an A.B. from Georgetown University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Richard I. Beattie is Senior Chairman of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, a position he has held since 2004. Mr. Beattie has been a partner of Simpson Thacher since 1977 and had served as Chairman of the Executive Committee of that firm from 1991 to 2004. Mr. Beattie specializes in counseling boards of directors and non-management directors on governance issues, investigations and litigation involving corporate officers and other crisis situations. He also specializes in mergers and acquisitions and leveraged buyouts.

15

Mr. Beattie also has a distinguished record of public service, including serving as General Counsel of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare during President Carter’s administration and as a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of State for Reorganization Issues in 1997 during President Clinton’s administration. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Beattie served as President Clinton’s Emissary for Cyprus.

Mr. Beattie is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Board of Overseers and Managers of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the Board of Managers of Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases. Mr. Beattie is also a member of the board and founder of New Visions for Public Schools. Mr. Beattie joined Simpson Thacher in 1968 after graduating from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Prior to law school, he served four years in the Marine Corps as a jet pilot after graduating from Dartmouth College in 1961.

Pamela G. Carlton was appointed to our Board on October 22, 2019. After 22 years as an investment banker on Wall Street, Ms. Carlton launched Springboard – Partners in Cross Cultural Leadership, LLC where she has been President since 2003. In addition in 2014, Ms. Carlton co-founded The Everest Project research initiative focused on women leading change and innovation in corporate America. Ms. Carlton retired as a Managing Director and Associate Director of U.S. Equity Research at JPMorgan Chase in May 2003, having also served as Director of U.S. Equity Research for Chase Asset Management from 1996 to 1999. Prior to JPMorgan Chase, Ms. Carlton was an investment banker with Morgan Stanley for 14 years in corporate finance and capital markets. While at Morgan Stanley, she was also Co-Director of U.S. and Latin America Equity Research. Ms. Carlton began her career as a corporate attorney at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton.

Ms. Carlton also serves on the following Boards: Columbia Threadneedle Investments mutual funds (which includes Tri-Continental Corporation and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth closed-end funds) where she is the Chair of the Board; Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. where she chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; DR Bank, where she is a member of the Audit Committee; and New York Presbyterian Hospital. Ms. Carlton is a member of the Women’s Forum of New York. She has served on the Board of Visitors of Yale School of Management, the Board of Visitors of Yale Law School, and the Board of Trustees of Williams College. Ms. Carlton earned a B.A. from Williams College and was elected President of the Williams College Phi Beta Kappa Society. She earned a J.D. from Yale Law School and an B.A. from Yale School of Management.

Ellen V. Futter served as the President of the American Museum of Natural History from November 1993 through March 15, 2023, when she was elected President Emerita. Previously, Ms. Futter served as the President of Barnard College and prior to that was a corporate attorney at the law firm of Milbank (formerly known as Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy). She also previously served as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Ms. Futter is a trustee of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and a director of Consolidated Edison, Inc., and is also a member of the board’s Executive Committee and its Safety Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. Ms. Futter is also a Trustee of the Brookings Institution, where she chairs the Nominations and Governance Committee and is a member of the board’s Executive Committee, a Governing Trustee at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, where she serves as a member of the Joint Nominating and Governance Committee and a Trustee of the Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School, and an ex officio Director of New York City Tourism and Conventions, where she serves as an ex officio member of its Executive Committee. Ms. Futter graduated Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum laude, from Barnard College and earned her J.D. from Columbia Law School.

Gail B. Harris is our Lead Director and serves as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Ms. Harris was also on the Board of Seacor Holdings Inc., where she served on the Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and on the Board of Cigna Life Insurance Company of New York, where she was the Lead Director and Chair of the Outside Directors/Audit Committee. In addition, Ms. Harris serves on the boards of several private companies.

16

Ms. Harris is the Chair of the Dean’s Advisory Council of Stanford Law School and is a member of the Advisory Council of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. She is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Ms. Harris previously served as a trustee on the Stanford University Board of Trustees, where she chaired the Special Committee on Investment Responsibility, and was a member of the Finance and Audit Committees. Ms. Harris is President Emeritus and a current member of the Board of New York Cares, the largest non-profit for volunteering in New York City.

Ms. Harris began her legal career at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP in 1977 and was a partner in the Corporate Department from 1984 to 1998. She was Of Counsel to Simpson Thacher through June 2011. Ms. Harris has extensive experience in advising boards of directors, and representing clients on general corporate and securities work, joint ventures, partnerships, acquisitions and dispositions. Ms. Harris received an A.B. with distinction from Stanford University and a J.D. from Stanford Law School.

Robert B. Millard formerly served as Chairman of the MIT Corporation, and served on its Executive Committee, until October 2020. Mr. Millard was also formerly a member of the MIT Investment Management Company endowment board. Prior to becoming Chairman of MIT, Mr. Millard served as the Chairman of Realm Partners LLC from 2009 to 2014 and held various senior roles, including Managing Director at Lehman Brothers and its predecessors from 1976 to 2008. Mr. Millard is the Lead Independent Director of the Board of Directors and Chair of the Compensation and Executive Committees of L-3 Communications Corporation. He also served as a director of Weatherford International, Inc. until February 2012 and director of GulfMark Offshore, Inc. until July 2013. He is a current member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves on its Finance and Budget Committee. Mr. Millard has an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School and an S.B. from MIT.

Willard J. Overlock, Jr. retired in 1996 from a career in investment banking. Mr. Overlock is a trustee emeritus of Rockefeller University and a Special Partner at Cue Ball Capital. Until recently, Mr. Overlock served as a member of the Board of Directors of Becton, Dickinson and Company and chairman of The Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation. He holds an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School and a B.A. from the University of North Carolina.

Sir Simon M. Robertson founded Simon Robertson Associates LLP, offering independent and trusted corporate finance advice to a limited number of major international companies, and has led the firm since its founding in 2005. Prior to founding his own firm, he was a Managing Director and President of Goldman Sachs Europe Limited from 1997 until he retired in 2005. Before joining Goldman Sachs, Sir Simon served various roles at the Kleinwort Benson Group. He joined the Kleinwort Benson Group in 1963, working in most of the businesses of the Kleinwort Benson Group before joining the Corporate Finance Division in 1968. He became Chairman of Kleinwort Benson Group Plc in 1996 and resigned from the Group in 1997.

Sir Simon is a director of several private companies, including Troy Asset Management Limited, Byhiras Group and Immodulon Therapeutics. He has served on the boards of numerous public and private entities in the past, including as Chairman of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (2005-2013), on the board of Berry Bros & Rudd Ltd (1998-2018), on the board of The Economist Newspaper Ltd. (2005-2017) and on the board of HSBC Holdings plc (2006-2016), where he was Senior Independent Director (2007-2015) and Deputy Chairman (2010-2016). In 2015 he joined the International Advisory Board of Brown Advisory, from which he retired in November 2021. He is a Visiting Professor at King’s College London (Department of Political Economy). He is also a member of the Supervisory Board of LOV Group Invest, an Ambassador of the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust and President of the Légion d’Honneur UK Chapter Limited from which he retired in January 2022. He is now Emeritus President of the Légion d’Honneur UK Chapter Limited. Sir Simon was knighted for services to Business in the Queen’s Birthday Honours list in 2010. He also became an “Officier” of the “Ordre des Arts et des Lettres” in 2011 and “Officier” de la Légion d’Honneur in 2014.

17

John S. Weinberg has served as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Evercore since February 25, 2022. Prior to February 2022, Mr. Weinberg served as Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-CEO along with Mr. Schlosstein since July 2020, and as Chairman of the Board from November 2016 until July 2020. Prior to joining Evercore, Mr. Weinberg was Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs Group from 2006 to 2015, was Co-Head of Global Investment Banking from 2002 until 2015 and served on its Management Committee from 2002 to 2015. Mr. Weinberg joined Goldman Sachs in 1983 as an Associate and was promoted to Partner in 1992.

Mr. Weinberg is a board member of Ford Motor Company, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Mr. Weinberg received a B.A. from Princeton University in 1979 and in 1983 earned an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

William J. Wheeler is a Vice Chairman of Athene Holding Ltd. Previously he served as President of Athene from 2015 to 2022. Prior to joining Athene, Mr. Wheeler was President of the Americas group for MetLife Inc., where he oversaw the insurance and retirement business in the United States and Latin America. Previously, Mr. Wheeler had been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at MetLife. Prior to joining MetLife, Mr. Wheeler was an investment banker at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. Mr. Wheeler has an A.B. from Wabash College, where he is now a member of the board of trustees, and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. He also serves on the boards of Venerable Holdings, Inc. and the American Council of Life Insurers.

Sarah K. Williamson has served as the Chief Executive Officer of FCLTGlobal, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to encouraging long-term behaviors in business and investment decision making, since July 2016. Ms. Williamson previously spent over 21 years at Wellington Management Company LLP, where she was most recently a Partner and Director of Alternative Investments. During her tenure at Wellington, Ms. Williamson served on a number of firm boards and committees, including on the Trust Investment Committee, as the Chair of the Wellington Trust Company, NA., and as the founding chair of the Diversity Committee. Ms. Williamson received her B.A. in economics, with honors, from Williams College in 1984 and earned an M.B.A., with distinction, from Harvard Business School in 1989.

18

When considering whether director nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each director’s individual biography set forth above and the qualifications described below.

19

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of Roger C. Altman, Richard I. Beattie, Pamela G. Carlton, Ellen V. Futter, Gail B. Harris, Robert B. Millard, Willard J. Overlock, Jr., Sir Simon M. Robertson, John S. Weinberg, William J. Wheeler and Sarah K. Williamson, each of whom has also been recommended by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is comprised exclusively of independent directors.

Unless authority to vote for one or more of the nominees is specifically withheld or authority to vote against one or more of the nominees is given according to the instructions in your signed proxy card or Notice, the proxies named in the enclosed proxy card will be voted “FOR” the election of Messrs. Altman, Beattie, Millard, Overlock, Weinberg, and Wheeler, Mses. Carlton, Futter, Harris and Williamson, and Sir Simon Robertson. Our Board does not contemplate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that contingency should occur prior to the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed proxy card will have the right to vote for such substitute nominee or nominees as they, in their discretion, may determine.

Majority Voting Policy

Our Board and management regularly monitor and discuss developments in corporate governance practices, and value the views of our shareholders on governance matters. Following discussions with several of our larger investors, our Board, upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, added a director resignation policy in 2017 to our Corporate Governance Principles dealing with the situation where a director nominee fails to receive majority support in an uncontested election. Under this policy, any nominee in an uncontested election who does not receive a greater number of “for” votes than “withhold” votes shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider the resignation offer and shall recommend to the Board the action to be taken. Any director whose resignation is under consideration shall not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommendation regarding whether to accept the resignation. The Board shall take action within 90 days following certification of the vote, and the Company will promptly disclose the Board’s decision and the reasons therefor, in a press release or Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. Our Corporate Governance Principles are available on our website at www.evercore.com.

Proxies will be voted FOR the 11 director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement unless otherwise specified.

20

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below are biographical summaries of our executive officers as of April 21, 2023. Each of our executive officers serves at the discretion of our Board without specified terms of office.

See “PROPOSAL 1—Election of Directors” above (on page 15) for information about Messrs. Altman and Weinberg.

Edward S. Hyman (78) is Chairman of Evercore ISI and Vice Chairman of Evercore. Prior to joining Evercore ISI in October 2014, Mr. Hyman was the Chairman and Founder of ISI Group, LLC and ISI Inc. Prior to forming both of these companies in 1991, Mr. Hyman was Vice Chairman and a member of the Board of C.J. Lawrence Inc., which he joined in 1972. He was an economic consultant at Data Resources, Inc. from 1969 to 1971. Mr. Hyman is a board member of China Institute and is a member of the Advisory Committee for The New York Public Library’s Financial Services Leadership Forum. He also serves on the Finance Committee of Bowdoin College and is a member of the Economic Club of New York. Mr. Hyman earned a B.S. in Engineering from the University of Texas in 1967 and received his M.B.A. from MIT in 1969.

Jason Klurfeld (50), General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, is responsible for our legal and compliance functions. Prior to joining us in June 2011, Mr. Klurfeld was a corporate and transactional attorney, focusing primarily on mergers, acquisitions, financings, strategic investments and other matters at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York from 2006 to 2011 and at Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in Washington, D.C. from 2004 to 2006. Prior to that, he served in government as an aide to New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Mr. Klurfeld earned a B.A. in economics from Hamilton College, a Masters in History from Oxford University (St. Antony’s College) and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania.

Timothy LaLonde* (61), CFO, is responsible for our financial, tax, internal audit, investor relations, information technology, and facilities functions. Over the past 22 years, Mr. LaLonde has served as Co-Head of the U.S. Advisory business and held several other global senior leadership roles at Evercore. He has over 33 years of experience in the investment banking industry and served clients for the first 20 years as an investment banker. Mr. LaLonde is a member of the Board of Advisors of the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota. He received a B.S.B. from the University of Minnesota, an M.Sc. from the London School of Economics and an M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College.

*We previously announced that our former CFO, Celeste Mellet left Evercore in early February to pursue a different area of finance. Mr. LaLonde has succeeded Ms. Mellet as Evercore’s CFO, effective March 6, 2023. Paul Pensa, Evercore’s controller, served as interim Chief Financial Officer, effective upon Ms. Mellet’s departure, and he continued in that role until Mr. LaLonde’s appointment became effective.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and any persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership in our stock. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish to us copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. As a matter of practice, our administrative staff assists our directors and officers in preparing and filing such reports with the SEC.

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of copies of the reports received by us and written representations by these individuals that no other reports were required since January 1, 2022, except as previously disclosed, all such filings under Section 16(a) were timely filed, except as reported on one Form 5 filed by or on behalf of Gail Harris, which due to inadvertent administrative oversight, incorrectly reported the number of shares of Common Stock donated.

21

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION

Tax Receivable Agreement

Limited partnership units in Evercore LP are held by, among others, current and former SMDs who provided services to our predecessor entities prior to our 2006 initial public offering, which includes Mr. Altman and Mr. LaLonde. Limited partnership units in Evercore LP may be exchanged for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications. Evercore LP has made and intends to make an election under Section 754 of the Code effective for each taxable year in which an exchange of limited partnership units for shares occurs, which may result in an adjustment to the tax basis of the assets owned by Evercore LP at the time of an exchange of limited partnership units. The exchanges have resulted and may in the future result in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Evercore LP that otherwise would not have been available. These increases in tax basis increased and in the future would increase (for tax purposes) amortization and, therefore, reduce the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay.

In connection with our IPO, we entered into a tax receivable agreement with certain of our current and former SMDs who were partners prior to our IPO and held Class A limited partnership units, including Mr. Altman and Mr. LaLonde, that provides for the payment by us to an exchanging Evercore partner of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we actually realize as a result of these increases in tax basis. We retain the economic benefit of the remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, of the tax benefits that we realize. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Evercore LP as a result of the exchanges and had we not entered into the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless we exercise our right to terminate the tax receivable agreement for an amount based on agreed payments remaining to be made under the agreement. In certain circumstances, we sold shares of Class A common stock in public offerings and used such cash consideration to acquire Evercore LP limited partnership units, which resulted in substantially similar rights and benefits under the tax receivable agreement as an exchange of Evercore LP limited partnership units for shares of Class A common stock.

While the actual amount and timing of any payments under this agreement will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the change in tax rates and the amount and timing of our income, we expect that, as a result of the size of the increases of the tangible and intangible assets of Evercore LP attributable to our interest in Evercore LP, during the expected term of the tax receivable agreement, the payments that we may make to such SMDs could be substantial. Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the Internal Revenue Service to challenge a tax basis increase, we are not entitled to reimbursement for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement.

As a result of the acquisition of Evercore LP limited partnership units by Evercore since the IPO, certain SMDs, including certain executive officers, became entitled to payments under the tax receivable agreement. During 2022, Mr. Altman (including estate planning vehicles and/or trusts for which Mr. Altman disclaims beneficial ownership) and Mr. LaLonde received payments pursuant to the tax receivable agreement of $1,614,096 and $177,360, respectively.

Registration Rights Agreements

In connection with the IPO, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our current and former SMDs who were partners prior to the IPO, pursuant to which we may be required to register the resale of shares of our Class A common stock held by certain current and former SMDs, including Mr. Altman, upon exchange of certain limited partnership units of Evercore LP held by such SMDs. The

22

holders of these registration rights may require us to register the sale of their shares of Class A common stock and to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, such registration rights agreements provide for certain piggyback registration rights in connection with registered offerings of our common stock. In addition, in connection with our acquisition of ISI, we granted registration rights to the former owners of ISI, including Mr. Hyman, requiring us to file a shelf registration statement covering the resale of shares of our Class A common stock received by them upon exchange of certain limited partnership units of Evercore LP, and giving Mr. Hyman certain piggyback registration rights in connection with registered offerings of our common stock.

Relationship with Our Former Private Equity Funds

Glisco

In 2016, the Company and the principals of its Mexican private equity business entered into an agreement to transfer ownership of its Mexican private equity business and related entities to Glisco Partners Inc. (“Glisco”), which assumed all responsibility for the management of the existing funds Glisco II and Glisco III (formerly Evercore Mexico Capital Partners II and III, respectively). Glisco is controlled by the principals. These principals ceased to be employed by Evercore following this transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, the Company will receive a fixed percentage of the management fees earned by Glisco for a period of up to 10 years, as well as a portion of the carried interest in the next two successor funds. The Company committed to invest capital in those successor funds consistent with the level of carried interest it owns and will retain its carried interest and its capital interests in the existing funds. The Company is entitled to 20% of the carried interest in such successor funds. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company entered into a transition services agreement to provide operational support to Glisco.

Following this transaction, the Company ceased to have a general partner’s interest in and deconsolidated GCP II and III (formerly Evercore Mexico Partners II and III), the general partners of Glisco II and Glisco III, respectively, and related subsidiaries. Evercore LP, through its subsidiaries, maintained an interest in the general partner of Glisco II and Glisco III and is entitled to (i) 50% of the carried interest realized from Glisco II and 45% of the carried interest realized from Glisco III and (ii) as an indirect investor in Glisco II and Glisco III, gains (or losses) on investments made by Glisco II and Glisco III based on the amount of capital that Evercore LP or its subsidiaries contributed or subsequently funded. For Glisco II and Glisco III, we will include as consolidated revenue all realized and unrealized carried interest earned by the general partners of Glisco II and Glisco III, although a portion of the carried interest is allocated to employees, and such amounts are recorded as compensation expense.

Carried interest entitles the general partners of Glisco II and Glisco III to a specified percentage of net investment gains that are generated on the capital invested by third-party investors in Glisco II and Glisco III. The general partners of each of Glisco II and Glisco III are entitled to a carried interest that allocates them 20% of the net investment gains realized on capital invested in Glisco II and Glisco III by third-party investors. Each of Glisco II and Glisco III includes a performance hurdle which requires them to return 8%, compounded annually, to third-party investors prior to the general partners receiving their 20% share of net profits realized by the third-party investors. The ultimate value of carried interest with respect to Glisco II and Glisco III are not determinable until the investments have been fully divested or otherwise monetized by the relevant fund, a process that can take many years. For Glisco II and Glisco III, carried interest is allocated on a fund-wide basis rather than on an investment-by-investment basis, and the vesting of carried interest for Glisco II and Glisco III is tied to the formation of the fund and other vesting thresholds. No carried interest will be paid to employees until such time as the carried interest is actually received by the general partners of Glisco II and Glisco III. Carried interest for Glisco II and Glisco III is subject to vesting, generally over a period of four years, and may only be transferred under limited circumstances.

23

Transactions with Our Mexican Private Equity Investments

Our investments in Glisco II and Glisco III as of December 31, 2022 were as follows:

The investment period has lapsed for Glisco II and Glisco III.

Certain employees and current and former SMDs, including Mr. Schlosstein and Mr. LaLonde, have also invested (either directly or through estate planning vehicles) their own capital through the general partners. For 2022, there were no contributions or receipt of proceeds from the Mexico Private Equity Funds for our executive officers, and no payments in respect of carried interest received by the general partner of the Mexico Private Equity Funds, in each case in excess of $120,000.

Relationship with Trilantic

We formed a strategic alliance with Trilantic to pursue private equity investment opportunities with Trilantic and to collaborate on the future growth of Trilantic’s business in 2010 and expanded our relationship on April 22, 2013 through a supplement agreement. As part of the original agreement and the supplement, we agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to source investment opportunities for Trilantic IV and Trilantic V, and Trilantic agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to refer to us mergers and acquisitions advisory services or restructuring advisory services from time to time with respect to selected portfolio companies of these Trilantic Funds.

In exchange for 500,000 Evercore LP limited partnership units that were later converted into 500,000 shares of our Class A common stock and sold, we received a minority economic interest in Trilantic and the right to invest in Trilantic’s current and future private equity funds, beginning with Trilantic IV. In connection with the issuance of such limited partnership interests in Trilantic, we became a limited partner of Trilantic and are entitled to receive 10% of the aggregate amount of carried interest in respect of all of the portfolio investments made by Trilantic IV, up to $15 million. In addition, we committed $5 million of the total capital commitments of Trilantic V. As of December 31, 2022, the carrying value of our investment in Trilantic IV was $89,160 and the carrying value of our investment in Trilantic V was $1,849,700. We and our affiliates are passive investors and do not participate in the management of any Trilantic-sponsored funds.

Separately, certain of our SMDs (either directly or through estate planning vehicles) have committed to invest up to $15 million in Trilantic V. For 2022, there were no contributions to or distributions from Trilantic V for our executive officers in excess of $120,000.

Evercore LP Partnership Agreement

We operate our business through Evercore LP and its subsidiaries and affiliates. As the general partner of Evercore LP, we have unilateral control over all of the affairs and decision making of Evercore LP. As such, we, through our officers, are responsible for all operational and administrative decisions of Evercore LP and the day-to-day management of Evercore LP’s business. Furthermore, we cannot be removed as the general partner of Evercore LP without our approval.

Distributions

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement of Evercore LP, we have the right to determine when distributions will be made to the partners of Evercore LP and the amount of any such distributions. If we authorize a distribution, such distribution will be made (1) in the case of a tax distribution (as described below),

24

to the holders of limited partnership units and interests in proportion to the amount of taxable income of Evercore LP allocated to such holder, (2) in the case of the distributions in respect of the Class L Interests, to such holders as determined by the Compensation Committee on behalf of the Company, in accordance with the terms of the applicable subscriptions agreements, as described below under “—Employment Agreements and Awards,” and (3) in the case of other distributions, pro-rata in accordance with the percentages of the holders’ respective limited partnership units (provided that holders of Class I-P and K-P units and Class L Interests are not entitled to distributions).

The holders of limited partnership units and interests in Evercore LP will incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and foreign taxes on their proportionate share of any net taxable income of Evercore LP. Net profits and net losses of Evercore LP will generally be allocated to its partners pro-rata in accordance with the percentages of their respective limited partnership units and interests. The Partnership Agreement provides for cash distributions to the partners of Evercore LP if we determine that the taxable income of Evercore LP will give rise to taxable income for its partners. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, we intend to cause Evercore LP to make cash distributions to the holders of limited partnership units and interests of Evercore LP for purposes of funding their tax obligations in respect of the income of Evercore LP that is allocated to them. Generally, these tax distributions will be computed based on our estimate of the net taxable income of Evercore LP allocable to such holder of limited partnership units and interests multiplied by an assumed tax rate equal to the highest effective marginal combined U.S. federal, state and local income tax rate prescribed for an individual or corporate resident in New York, New York (taking into account the non-deductibility of certain expenses and the character of our income).

For 2022, Mr. Altman (including estate planning vehicles and/or trusts for which Mr. Altman disclaims beneficial ownership of) received $1,763,413 as regular distributions on limited partnership units. In addition, certain of our NEOs received as distributions on the Class L Interests held by them the amounts described in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 50.

Dissolution

Evercore LP may be dissolved only upon the occurrence of certain unlikely events specified in the Partnership Agreement. Upon dissolution, Evercore LP will be liquidated and the proceeds from any liquidation shall be applied and distributed in the following order:

Use of Corporate Aircraft

For security, safety and health reasons, our Board adopted a policy requiring our Senior Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to use corporate aircraft for certain business air travel to the extent practical.

While the primary use of corporate aircraft is for business purposes, because of the benefit afforded to us in terms of security and productivity while traveling for personal reasons, we allow Messrs. Altman, Weinberg and Schlosstein to use the aircraft for personal travel, when the aircraft are not being used for Company business. Under these arrangements, Messrs. Altman, Weinberg and Schlosstein must reimburse us for an amount equal to or exceeding the incremental cost associated with their personal use of the aircraft, which generally reimburse us for the full incremental costs and a pro-rata share of the fixed costs. Mr. Weinberg did not use the aircraft for personal travel in 2022, and Messrs. Altman and Schlosstein reimbursed us for their personal use of the aircraft in 2022 in amounts equal to $458,724 and $349,702, respectively, which generally included the full incremental costs and a pro-rata share of the fixed costs, and which in all cases equaled or

25

exceeded the incremental costs associated with such use. Depending on the nature of the aircraft and applicable regulatory guidelines, the required amount of reimbursement was calculated by assessing either (i) the maximum amount of reimbursement allowed by Federal Aviation Administration rules (including enumerated direct costs such as fuel, crew travel expenses, landing fees, flight planning and an additional amount equal to 100% of fuel costs) or (ii) 100% of the costs charged to the Company by certificated air carriers/fractional program operators for personal flights, including a proportionate share of the annual management fees (where applicable). In addition, on limited occasion, we have allowed a business-related flight to deviate and land at an airport other than its destination to drop-off or pick-up a non-business traveler, without such change in destination being treated as an incremental cost.

Transactions with Other 5% Shareholders

From time to time, we engage in ordinary course transactions with entities or affiliates of entities that are the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. For example, BlackRock and Vanguard are clients of our Institutional Equities business. All of our transactions with these 5% holders and their affiliates were arms-length transactions entered into in the ordinary course of business, with management and other fees based on the prevailing rates for non-related persons.

Ordinary Course Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors

From time to time, certain executive officers, directors and other affiliates of ours, their family members, and related business organizations or charitable foundations may utilize our services as customers in the ordinary course of our business, such as by holding investments in various Evercore Wealth Management investment vehicles or accounts or by purchasing research services from our equity sales, trading and research business, Evercore ISI. These products and services are offered and provided in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions for similarly situated customers. For certain types of products and services offered by Evercore Wealth Management, certain of our executive officers and other affiliates receive or may be eligible to receive discounts that are available to our employees or SMDs generally.

Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

Our Related Person Transaction Policy, which is available on our website at www.evercore.com under the “For Investors” link, requires that Related Person Transactions (defined below) must be approved or ratified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board unless they have been deemed pre-approved. In determining whether to approve or ratify a Related Person Transaction, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the Related Person Transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the Related Person’s interest in the transaction. Under the policy, certain Related Person Transactions are pre-approved, including routine commercial transactions in the ordinary course or transactions that are approved by other committees of the Board. A “Related Person” is any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees, any shareholder owning at least 5% of our stock, or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons. A “Related Person Transaction” means any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar financial transactions, arrangements or relationships involving more than $120,000 in which we are a participant and in which a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest. All Related Person Transactions were approved in accordance with our Related Person Transaction Policy, other than those discussed under “—Tax Receivable Agreement” on page 22, “—Registration Rights Agreements” on page 22, “—Relationship with Our Former Private Equity Funds” on page 23 and “—Evercore LP Partnership Agreement” on page 24, which were undertaken prior to the adoption of the policy.

26

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

General

Pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the state in which we are organized, and our Amended and Restated Bylaws, our business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of our Board. Members of our Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our executive officers and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them by management and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.

NYSE and SEC Requirements

Under the NYSE’s corporate governance rules, no director qualifies as independent unless our Board affirmatively determines that the director has no “material relationship” with us, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. Under NYSE rules, directors who have relationships covered by one of five bright-line independence tests established by the NYSE may not be found to be independent. In addition, audit committee members are subject to heightened independence requirements under NYSE rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. NYSE rules require that in affirmatively determining the independence of any director who will serve on the Compensation Committee, the Board must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to us that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member.

Corporate Governance Principles and Categorical Independence Standards

In order to provide guidance on the composition and function of our governing body, our Board adopted our Corporate Governance Principles, which include, among other things, our categorical standards of director independence. The complete version of our Corporate Governance Principles is available on our website at www.evercore.com under the “For Investors” link. We will provide a printed copy of the Corporate Governance Principles to any shareholder who requests them by contacting Investor Relations. These categorical independence standards establish certain relationships that our Board, in its judgment, has deemed to be material or immaterial for purposes of assessing a director’s independence. In the event a director maintains any relationship with us that is not specifically addressed in these standards, the Board will determine whether such relationship is material.

The Board has determined that the following relationships should not be considered material relationships that would impair a director’s independence: (1) relationships where a director, or an immediate family member of the director, is an executive officer or director of another company in which we beneficially own less than 10% of the outstanding voting shares of that company; (2) relationships where a director, or an immediate family member of that director, serves as an executive officer, director or trustee of a charitable organization, and our annual charitable contributions to the organization (excluding contributions by us under any established matching gift program) are less than the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues in its most recent fiscal year; and (3) relationships where a director is a current employee, or such director’s immediate family member is a current executive officer, of another company that has made payments to, or received payment from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the preceding three fiscal years, did not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of the consolidated gross revenues of such other company.

Our Corporate Governance Principles also provide, among other things, that all non-management directors must notify the Board of his or her retirement, change in employer and any other significant change in the director’s principal professional occupation or roles and responsibilities and, in

27

connection with any such change, tender his or her resignation from the Board (and the applicable Board committees) for consideration by the Board. The Board would then consider the continued appropriateness of Board membership under the new circumstances and the action, if any, to be taken with respect to such resignation.

Evaluations of Director Independence

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee undertook its annual review of director independence and reviewed its findings with our Board. During this review, our Board considered transactions and relationships between each director, or any member of his or her immediate family, and us, our subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Related Person Transactions and Other Information” above (on page 22). Our Board also examined transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions compromised a director’s independence.

As a result of this review, our Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Beattie, Millard, Overlock and Wheeler, Mses. Carlton, Futter, Harris and Williamson and Sir Simon Robertson is independent under NYSE rules and the categorical standards for director independence set forth in the Corporate Governance Principles. In reaching this determination, the Board considered the fact that Mr. Beattie is a partner of Simpson Thacher, which provides legal services to us and our affiliates. In reaching this conclusion with respect to Mr. Beattie, it was noted that in 2022 payments from us to Simpson Thacher were less than 1% of Simpson Thacher’s revenues. In connection with Mr. Beattie, it was also noted that Simpson Thacher’s partnership income attributed to payments from us in 2022 resulted in less than $10,000 in income to Mr. Beattie.

Our Board has also determined that the members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee are also independent under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules mentioned above.

Messrs. Altman and Weinberg are not considered to be independent directors as a result of their employment with us.

Committees of the Board

General

Our Board has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

28

The following table shows the membership of each of our Board’s standing committees as of April 21, 2023 and the number of in-person and telephonic meetings held by each of those committees during 2022:

Our Board met in full session six times during 2022. Our Board’s standing committees held a total of 17 additional meetings (eight Audit Committee, six Compensation Committee and three Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings).

Our Board has adopted a charter for each of the three standing committees that addresses the composition and function of each committee. You can find links to these materials on our website at www.evercore.com under the “For Investors” link, and we will provide a printed copy of these materials to any shareholder who requests it by contacting Investor Relations.

Audit Committee

General. The Audit Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its responsibility relating to the oversight of: (1) the quality and integrity of our financial statements, (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, (4) the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and (5) risk management and compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Financial Literacy and Expertise. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee in 2022 was and in 2023 is “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board has determined that each of Mr. Wheeler and Ms. Williamson qualifies as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined by applicable SEC regulations and that each has “accounting or related financial management expertise” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Wheeler’s qualification based on, among other things, his experience as chief financial officer at a large multinational public company, his executive leadership experience and his experience with financial institutions and the Board reached its conclusion as to Ms. Williamson’s qualification based on, among other things, her experience with financial reporting and internal auditing, including with respect to oversight of public accountants.

Compensation Committee

General. The Compensation Committee discharges the responsibilities of our Board relating to the oversight of our compensation programs and compensation of our executives. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee in 2022 was and in 2023 is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)

29

of the Code as in effect during 2017 and a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 16b-3. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee can delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. For information on the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for considering and determining executive and director compensation and the role of executive officers in determining and recommending the amount and form of such compensation, see “Director Compensation” on page 34 and “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” on page 36.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. During the last fiscal year, each of Messrs. Millard, Overlock and Wheeler, Ms. Williamson and Sir Simon Robertson served as members of our Compensation Committee, and no member of our Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2022 was an employee or officer or former employee or officer of the Company or had any interest in a transaction requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K during fiscal year 2022. None of our executive officers has served as a member of a board of directors or a compensation committee of a board of directors of any other entity which has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee, and there are no other matters regarding interlocks or insider participation that are required to be disclosed.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

General. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to corporate governance by (1) identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending that our Board select the candidates for all directorships to be filled by our Board or by our shareholders, (2) overseeing the evaluation of the Board, (3) developing and recommending the content of our Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to our Board, (4) overseeing the Company’s adherence to its Core Values, including Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, and the implementation of its Environmental, Social and Governance program, and (5) otherwise taking a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance. In evaluating candidates for directorships, our Board, with the help of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, takes into account a variety of factors it considers appropriate, which may include the following: strength of character and leadership skills; general business acumen and experience; knowledge of strategy, finance, international business, government affairs and familiarity with our business and industry; age; number of other board seats; willingness to commit the necessary time; and whether the nominee assists in achieving a mix of members that represents a diversity of background and experience—all to ensure an active Board whose members work well together and possess the collective knowledge and expertise required to maximize the effectiveness of the Board. Accordingly, although diversity may be a consideration in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board do not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. From time to time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board have engaged a third-party search firm to assist in identifying potential nominees for our Board.

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominations. As noted above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations for nomination to our Board, including nominations submitted by shareholders. Such recommendations should be sent to the attention of our Corporate Secretary. Any recommendations submitted to the Corporate Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the shareholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include the information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a Proxy Statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a signed consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all potential candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation. Based on the information provided to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, it will make an initial determination whether to conduct a full evaluation of a candidate. As part of the full evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance

30

Committee may conduct interviews, obtain additional background information and conduct reference checks of candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also ask the candidate to meet with management and other members of our Board. When the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews a potential candidate, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks specifically at the candidate’s qualifications in light of our needs and the needs of the Board at that time, given the current mix of director attributes. In evaluating a candidate, our Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, takes into account a variety of additional factors as described in our Corporate Governance Principles.

Meeting Attendance

During 2022, our Board met in full session six times, and our Board’s standing committees held a total of 17 additional meetings (eight Audit Committee, six Compensation Committee and three Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings). Each of our directors attended over 80% of the Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served). Our policy is that all of our directors, absent special circumstances, should attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our then incumbent directors attended our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Executive Sessions, Role of the Chairman of Our Board, CEO and Lead Director

Our Corporate Governance Principles require our non-management directors, all of whom are also independent under applicable regulations and our Corporate Governance Principles, to have at least one meeting per year without management present. We complied with this requirement in 2022, as our non-management directors meet regularly in executive session.

We have no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and CEO. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and CEO is best decided on a case-by-case basis from time to time. In 2020, the Board appointed each of Messrs. Weinberg and Schlosstein to serve as Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer. Effective February 25, 2022, the Board appointed Mr. Weinberg to serve as sole Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Schlosstein continues to serve as Chairman Emeritus (a non-Board position). In order to facilitate communications among non-management directors and management and to preside over executive sessions, the Board has selected Ms. Harris to serve as the lead director. As lead director, Ms. Harris is responsible for working with the Chairman and CEO to develop and approve Board agendas and meeting schedules, conducting executive sessions with the non-management members of the Board, leading Board and Committee evaluations and otherwise serving as a liaison amongst our non-management directors.

Under the guidance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each year the Board reviews the structure of our Board and its committees as a part of its annual self-evaluation process and, as part of that process, considers, among other things, issues of structure, leadership and oversight needs and skills to guide the company in executing its long-term strategic objectives. The Board is satisfied that its current structure and processes are appropriate.

Oversight of Risk Management by the Board

We are exposed to a number of risks, and we regularly identify and evaluate these risks and develop plans to manage them effectively. The Audit Committee is charged with a majority of the risk oversight responsibilities on behalf of the Board (including risk associated with cybersecurity), our Compensation Committee is charged with the oversight responsibility related to our compensation programs and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with human capital, ESG, including diversity, equity and inclusion, board organization, membership and structure and succession planning for our directors. The Audit

31

Committee also works with members of senior management to review our cybersecurity policies and procedures. The Board is aware of the threats presented by cybersecurity incidents (including the increased risk relating to the remote working environment and geopolitical issues) and is committed to preventing and mitigating the effects of any such incidents. The Board and the Audit Committee are updated regularly on cybersecurity matters. Our CFO and General Counsel both report directly to our CEO and meet with the Audit Committee at least four times a year in conjunction with a review of our quarterly and annual periodic SEC filings to discuss important risks we face, highlighting any new risks that may have arisen since they last met. Our CFO and General Counsel update our Audit Committee as to changes in our risks on a periodic basis. In addition, all non-management members of the Board are invited to attend all committee meetings, regardless of whether the individual sits on the specific committee. Outside of formal meetings, Board members have regular access to senior executives, including our CFO and General Counsel.

Each of our business unit leaders is responsible for various aspects of risk management associated with their business, and our executive officers, including our CEO, CFO and General Counsel, also have the primary responsibility for enterprise-wide risk management. Our CFO and General Counsel work closely with members of senior management, including our accounting staff, our internal audit department, our information technology department and our compliance department to monitor and manage risk.

Shareholder Engagement

As we have done in the past, in 2022 we engaged in extensive shareholder outreach. In our meetings and other engagement with shareholders, we primarily discussed feedback on our executive compensation program, financial performance, corporate governance initiatives, use of equity compensation, sustainability and other matters. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Say on Pay Vote” on page 48 for more information on our recent engagement efforts, as well as key shareholder feedback provided to us during the engagement process.

We are committed to having an open dialogue, and we proactively engage with shareholders in discussions regarding our objectives. We view an open dialogue with our shareholders as a valuable tool that allows us to better appreciate our shareholders’ perspective. Our senior management frequently meets face-to-face and communicates telephonically with our shareholders. We carefully consider the feedback we receive from our shareholders in meetings and through other communications. We also participate in investor conferences, and we make investor presentations available on our website at www.evercore.com under the “For Investors” link.

Communicating with the Board

Interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, our non-management directors or an individual director by writing to our Corporate Secretary and specifying whether such communication should be addressed to the attention of (1) the Board as a whole, (2) non-management directors as a group or (3) the name of the individual director, as applicable. Communications will be distributed to our Board, non-management directors as a group or to any individual director or directors as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. In that regard, our Board has requested that certain items that are unrelated to its duties and responsibilities should be excluded, such as spam, junk mail and mass mailings, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys and business solicitations or advertisements.

In addition, material that is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable will be excluded, with the provision that any communication that is filtered out must be made available to any non-management director upon request. Any concerns relating to accounting, internal control over financial reporting or auditing matters will be brought to the attention of our Audit Committee. In addition, for such matters, shareholders and others are encouraged to use our hotline discussed below.

32

Hotline for Accounting, Auditing and Other Matters

As part of the Audit Committee’s role to establish procedures for the receipt of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, we established a hotline for the anonymous submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal control over financial reporting, auditing matters, employee matters and other matters. Communications are distributed to the Board, or to any individual director as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Any matters reported through the hotline that involve accounting, internal control over financial reporting, audit matters or any fraud involving management or persons who have a significant role in our internal control over financial reporting will be reported to the Chairman of our Audit Committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our employees, including our CEO, our CFO, our Controller (or persons performing similar functions) and our Board. You can find a link to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website at www.evercore.com under the “For Investors” link, and we will provide a printed copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any shareholder who contacts Investor Relations and requests a copy. To the extent required to be disclosed, we will post amendments to, or any waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics at the same location on our website as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

33

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our policy is to not pay director compensation to directors who are also our employees. The Board’s non-employee director compensation policies provide for non-management directors to receive a one-time award of RSUs with a value of $50,000 upon initial appointment to the Board, which vest on the second anniversary of the grant date. For 2022, non-management directors also receive an annual retainer and RSU grant, with amounts outlined below.

In early 2022, we worked with F.W. Cook, an independent compensation consultant, to conduct a review of the compensation paid to our non-employee directors. Based on the recommendation of F.W. Cook, and given the large growth in size and complexity of the Company since 2016 (the last time the compensation of our non-employee directors was increased) and the increased number of Board and Committee meetings, our Board decided that effective as of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, non-employee directors should receive an increase in the annual retainer to $125,000 (up from $90,000), and an increase in the annual RSU grant to $125,000 (up from $90,000). In addition, the Board decided to increase the compensation for Committee Chairs to $30,000 (up from $20,000). The annual retainer will be payable either 100% in cash or common stock, or 50% in cash and 50% in common stock, at the director’s option. The Board believes that our payment structure is consistent with the compensation practices of our peers and similarly situated companies.

Other Compensation. Non-management directors are further reimbursed for travel and related expenses associated with attendance at Board or committee meetings, as well as expenses for continuing education programs related to their role as members of the Board. For administrative ease in dealing with our transfer agent and our stock plan administrator, equity awards that would otherwise result in fractional shares are rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Details on 2022 RSU Grants. Each non-management director received, upon his or her re-election to the Board on June 16, 2022, an award of 1,184 RSUs with a value of approximately $125,000, based on the average of the high and low average share price during each day of the 10-trading-day period from June 2, 2022 through June 15, 2022, with the exception of Ms. Williamson, who elected to receive her retainer 100% in common stock rather than cash, and accordingly received an award of 2,367 RSUs with a value of approximately $250,000, based on the average of the high and low average share price during each day of the 10-trading-day period from June 2, 2022 through June 15, 2022. These RSUs will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Equity Ownership Guideline: 3x Most Recent Annual Retainer. Our Board has also adopted equity ownership guidelines that require our non-management directors to own shares of Class A common stock, including RSUs awarded in connection with service on the Board, shares beneficially owned by his or her immediate family members residing in the same household and shares held in trust for the benefit of the director or his or her immediate family members, with a value equal to or greater than three times the director’s most recently paid annual retainer. Until a director meets the required ownership level, he or she must retain 100% of shares received upon vesting of RSUs (other than shares sold to satisfy tax obligations associated with vesting and delivery of shares) awarded in connection with service on the Board. Compliance with these guidelines may be waived, at the discretion of our Nominating and Corporate Governance

34

Committee, if compliance would create severe hardship for a non-management director or prevent him or her from complying with a court order. It is expected that these instances will be rare and, in these cases, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will develop alternative ownership guidelines that reflect the intent of these guidelines and the director’s personal circumstances.

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us to or on behalf of our non-management directors for services rendered to us during 2022.

Director Compensation in 2022

35

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

The following discussions and tables provide summary information concerning compensation for our NEOs, who for 2022 are: Messrs. Altman, Weinberg, Schlosstein, Hyman and Klurfeld, and Ms. Mellet.

Our executive compensation program reflects the Company’s commitment to pay for performance. Executives that serve in our business units, including those that are NEOs, are paid largely on their contribution to our success and the success of their respective business units, motivating them to conduct the business in a manner that produces superior results over the long term.

Consistent with our commitment to pay for performance, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s solid financial results during a challenging business environment, including its second-best full year Adjusted Net Revenues,* Adjusted EPS* and Adjusted Net Income*, while taking into account the Company’s performance. The Compensation Committee also considered the accomplishment of the Company’s capital return and strategic objectives, and the promotion of and adherence to our Core Values, including as they relate to sustainability and to our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

The following sections provide an overview of 2022 performance, compensation and incentive highlights, say on pay results and our related shareholder outreach efforts.

36

37

As discussed throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, in determining NEO compensation for 2022, our Compensation Committee considered the Company’s solid financial results during a challenging business environment, including its second-best full year Adjusted Net Revenues,* Adjusted EPS* and Adjusted Net Income*, while taking into account the Company’s performance. The Compensation Committee also considered the accomplishment of several strategic initiatives, the contributions each individual NEO made to the firm and the value created and capital returned to our shareholders, including through dividends and repurchases during 2022. The Compensation Committee further took into account the promotion of and adherence to our core values—Client Focus, Integrity, Excellence, Respect, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Investment in People and Partnership—which are critical to our reputation, culture and maintaining a sustainable business with long-term success. The following are highlights of the Company’s 2022 performance.

38

Our TSR continues to demonstrate the long-term positive growth in our share price*

* Peer Group includes Moelis & Company, Houlihan Lokey, PJT Partners, Lazard and Greenhill. TSR is calculated 12/31 to 12/31, assuming reinvestment of dividends. Equal weighted index methodology.

Our pay for performance compensation program is designed to reward performance and align the long-term interests of our executives with those of our shareholders – for example, through our equity ownership guidelines and by prohibiting hedging and pledging by our directors and executive officers. The following are highlights of our 2022 compensation and incentive structure, as determined by our Compensation Committee.

39

40

The goals of our executive compensation program are to align compensation and incentives with business objectives and performance, and in turn continue to create and sustain shareholder value over the long term. In addition, our program is designed to enable us to attract, retain and reward executives who contribute to our long-term success and growth in shareholder value. Our future success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to retain and recruit highly qualified personnel as opposed to the deployment and management of the firm’s financial capital, as with other financial services firms. The market for highly qualified financial professionals has been and remains extremely competitive. In addition, although our NEOs and other SMDs have all entered into restrictive covenant agreements, their departure could still jeopardize our relationships with clients and result in the loss of client engagements. Accordingly, it is imperative for our compensation and incentive programs to be highly competitive and reward outstanding individual and Company achievement.

41

Consistent with industry practice, incentive awards account for a majority of our NEOs’ total compensation and incentive opportunities. In our case, base salary averaged approximately 10% of total 2022 compensation for our NEOs. For 2022, no guaranteed incentive awards were paid to any NEO, nor were any of our NEOs paid any compensation pursuant to formulaic or other pre-established performance targets or personal compensation arrangements. Rather, incentive awards paid to our NEOs were determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee after taking into account the Company’s performance along with the NEO’s individual contributions, the NEO’s promotion of and adherence to our Core Values, and other factors.

Ultimately, 50% of total 2022 incentive award amounts were paid to our NEOs in cash incentive distributions or payments and the remaining 50% paid in RSUs that vest over a four-year period, subject to retirement eligibility and other earlier vesting conditions. As in 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that the cash incentive compensation payments that may otherwise have been made to the NEOs in respect of their service in 2022 would be delivered in the form of distributions in respect of Class L Interests in Evercore LP, awarded to each of the NEOs other than Ms. Mellet in May 2022. Distributions payable with respect to the awards of Class L Interests granted in 2022 were determined by the Committee in its discretion and paid in the first quarter of 2023, and were subject to a maximum amount equal to a specified percentage of 2022 Adjusted Operating Income, as defined in the relevant subscription agreement.

The Compensation Committee decided that 50% of our NEOs’ 2022 incentive awards would be paid in RSUs and subject to future service-based vesting requirements, because awarding equity over a longer period aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. As a result, we believe our NEOs have a demonstrable and significant interest in increasing shareholder value over the long term.

42

We refer to the portion of our NEOs’ 2022 compensation granted in RSUs as “deferred compensation” because it will not be delivered until a future year (and then, only if applicable vesting requirements have been met). See “—Employment Agreements and Awards—Evercore Annual Equity Awards” on page 49 for a discussion of the terms of these awards.

Company Performance and Individual Contributions

As noted above, in determining incentive awards for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee took into account the Company’s performance along with the other NEO accomplishments, including the financial results achieved by the Company, the accomplishment of several strategic initiatives, the contributions each individual NEO made to the firm and the value created and capital returned to our shareholders, including through dividends and repurchases during 2022. The Committee noted, among other achievements, our solid Net Revenues, Net Income, EPS, and Operating Margin, in each case, on a U.S. GAAP and an Adjusted basis. See Annex A for further information and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP amounts.

Below is a summary of the specific unique factors identified by the Compensation Committee for each NEO.

Mr. Altman. Mr. Altman was awarded a discretionary annual incentive award with a value of $7.5 million for 2022. In determining this amount, the Compensation Committee considered the overall performance of the Company, while recognizing his continued leadership in serving clients and pursuing new business opportunities. Mr. Altman played a key role on our work with many of our largest and most strategically important M&A, restructuring and capital advisory clients. Mr. Altman remains a visible spokesperson for Evercore both in public media as well as in clients meetings. He also contributed to the recruitment and retention of key employees within the firm and was an exemplar of the firm’s culture and Core Values.

Mr. Weinberg. In determining Mr. Weinberg’s discretionary annual incentive award, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Weinberg’s role in leading the Company while navigating macroeconomic and business challenges, resulting in the Company’s second strongest year in terms of operating results in its history. Since February 2022, Mr. Weinberg was solely responsible for the management of the business and setting and achieving objectives relating to Evercore’s most important strategic matters, recruitment and retention, cost management, and meaningful growth opportunities for 2023 and beyond. He led the business while continuing to prioritize our people, our clients and our shareholders, with continuing focus on, and upholding of, our Core Values, maintaining and strengthening our culture and community, and advancing our DE&I efforts. Mr. Weinberg was also actively involved in serving a number of clients. He continues to be a leader in recruiting experienced talent to the firm and was instrumental in recruiting several Advisory senior managing directors in 2022, expanding coverage of key sectors. He was also instrumental in retaining key personnel and developing talent from within Evercore. However, in light of the Company’s overall performance, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Weinberg a discretionary annual incentive award with a value of $6.5 million, representing an approximately 41% decrease from last year’s discretionary annual incentive award.

43

As previously disclosed in our 2017 proxy statement and other public filings, when Mr. Weinberg first joined Evercore in 2016, he was granted an initial long-term sign-on restricted cash award of $35 million, which included $6 million that vested on March 1, 2022. This award is not a part of Mr. Weinberg’s discretionary annual bonus in respect of any year of his service. Approximately 75% of the sign-on and replacement awards granted to Mr. Weinberg were intended to replace deferred compensation (a portion of which was variable) from Mr. Weinberg’s former employer that he forfeited as a result of joining the Company, with the remaining approximately 25% of such awards granted as an inducement to join the Company. The restricted sign-on cash award provides the Compensation Committee with the ability to adjust the amount payable on any applicable vesting date, provided that the amount may not be increased to more than 200% of the target amount or decreased by more than 25% of the target amount. The Compensation Committee determined not to increase or decrease the $6 million that vested on March 1, 2022.

Mr. Schlosstein. Mr. Schlosstein served as Co-Chief Executive Officer through February 25, 2022. In connection with determining the amount of Mr. Schlosstein’s discretionary annual incentive award for 2022, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Schlosstein’s service and leadership as Co-Chief Executive Officer through February 25, 2022, and thereafter as Chairman Emeritus, including his responsibility for advancing several key strategic initiatives, client matters, mentorship of employees within the firm and various opportunities in our businesses. Mr. Schlosstein was awarded a discretionary annual incentive award of $3.5 million.

Mr. Hyman. Mr. Hyman was awarded a discretionary annual incentive award with a value of $4.1 million for 2022. In determining this amount, the Compensation Committee took into account his continued performance as the top-ranked macroeconomic analyst, his significant continuing work with clients, and his contribution to the leadership of Evercore ISI as its Chairman, while also taking into account the overall performance of Evercore ISI and the Company more broadly. Mr. Hyman was and continues to be an important expert voice on the economy for our clients and our firm.

Mr. Klurfeld. Mr. Klurfeld was awarded a discretionary annual incentive award with a value of $3.75 million for 2022. In determining this amount, the Compensation Committee took into account his significant contributions to the Company. In 2022, Mr. Klurfeld was responsible for implementing and enhancing global compliance policies and managing the Company’s response to evolving regulations and requirements. He also played a critical role in many of the Company’s strategic initiatives and was responsible for corporate governance matters, including our sustainability programs. Together with the CFO, Mr. Klurfeld was responsible for managing the Company’s operational and reputational risks.

Ms. Mellet. While at the time of her employment commencement we had agreed to provide Ms. Mellet a minimum annual incentive award for 2022, Ms. Mellet was ultimately not awarded an annual incentive award for 2022, as her resignation as CFO occurred prior to the date bonuses were awarded to employees of the firm.

44

2022 NEO Annual Compensation and Incentives

The following table is presented to show how the Compensation Committee viewed annual compensation and incentive awards for our NEOs for their 2022 performance, and includes base salary as well as year-end cash and equity incentive awards for 2022 performance, paid or granted in February 2023. This table differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table on page 50 and is not a substitute for that table. The Summary Compensation Table provides compensation information as required by SEC regulations, and therefore reflects for 2022 the grant date fair value of equity awards granted during the 2022 calendar year (that is, those awards granted in February 2022 for 2021 performance), while not including the equity awards granted in February 2023 for 2022 performance. The Summary Compensation Table also includes the portion of Mr. Weinberg’s one-time sign-on and replacement awards that were earned in 2022, 2021 and 2020 but initially granted in 2016 in connection with his recruitment, as well as the portion of Mr. Klurfeld’s deferred cash award that was earned in 2022, 2021 and 2020 but was initially granted in 2018, each of which the Compensation Committee does not view as part of annual compensation and incentive awards as discussed above.

45

Role of the Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for implementing and administering all aspects of our compensation, incentive and benefit plans and programs for our NEOs. In establishing compensation and incentive awards for our NEOs, we take into account the fact that we generally do not provide significant retirement or similar benefits to our NEOs. We also take into account other economic relationships between the individual and us, including equity ownership.

Messrs. Altman and Weinberg each participated in discussions with the Compensation Committee and made recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation of senior employees (except as to their own compensation), but they do not vote or otherwise participate in the Compensation Committee’s ultimate determinations. Our Board believes that it is wise and prudent to have Messrs. Altman and Weinberg participate in these discussions because they possess unique insight regarding the day-to-day performance of our executives.

In connection with making 2022 NEO compensation and incentive award determinations, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation and incentives to be awarded to certain other employees to assess internal balance and consistency in compensation levels, including: (a) for Mr. Weinberg, the incentive award amounts payable to other NEOs, (b) for Messrs. Altman, Hyman, Weinberg and Schlosstein, the incentive award amounts payable to other SMDs devoted to generating revenue through existing or new client relationships and (c) for Mr. Klurfeld, the incentive award amounts payable to SMDs who did not have client revenue-generating responsibilities. The Compensation Committee, however, did not fix internal pay ratios at any specified levels.

For 2022, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the performance and NEO compensation data from certain financial institutions. While many of the companies included in such data may be described as financial services companies where human capital is of critical importance, Evercore competes with only a small subset of these companies for employees and clients. The companies included in the peer group considered by the Compensation Committee include Bank of America, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Houlihan Lokey, JPMorgan Chase, Lazard, Moelis & Company, Morgan Stanley, PJT Partners and UBS, with Greenhill, Houlihan Lokey, Lazard, Moelis, Perella Weinberg Partners, and PJT Partners being our most direct public independent peers, with whom competition for qualified personnel has historically been intense. The Compensation Committee has not set any specific metrics or targets relative to these competitors or any of the other companies comprising our compensation peer group.

46

Assessment of Risk

Our compensation and incentive programs are designed to discourage excessive risk-taking. The base salary component of compensation does not encourage risk-taking because it is a fixed amount. In addition, there are several other factors associated with our equity ownership, incentive award programs and CEO compensation and incentive awards that discourage inappropriate or excessive risk-taking:

Clawback Policy

Our comprehensive clawback policy applies to all incentive compensation awarded to our SMDs, including RSUs, cash awards and awards of partnership units and interests of Evercore LP. The policy requires SMDs to repay us or forfeit (i) upon a restatement of our financial results due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements, an amount up to the difference between the amount of incentive compensation the SMD received and/or realized and the amount the SMD would have received and/or realized based on the restated financial results or (ii) upon a finding of certain misconduct, an amount up to the aggregate incentive compensation granted to such SMD over the last three fiscal years of the Company. In light of rules recently issued by the SEC regarding clawback policies, we expect to review our clawback policy in 2023 following the NYSE’s adoption of its relevant clawback listing standards and determine at that time whether any updates to our policy are warranted.

47

Linkage of Management and Shareholder Interests—Equity Ownership Guidelines

Our formal equity ownership guidelines are applicable to all SMDs. The goal of these guidelines is to formalize our practice of encouraging executive officers to have a meaningful amount of Evercore equity at risk. In particular, we focused on developing a simple method of calculating required thresholds and concluded that adopting an ownership amount based on a number of shares rather than dollar value would be most effective. The equity ownership guidelines count Class A common stock, Evercore LP limited partnership units and vested and unvested RSUs as shares or share equivalents.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers certain tax implications when designing our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee believes that there are circumstances where the provision of compensation that is not fully tax deductible may be more consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives and/or may be in our best interests and those of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes that retaining the ability to exercise discretion and the flexibility to attract, retain and motivate executives with a compensation program that aligns with our long-term business objectives, in many circumstances, outweighs the advantages of qualifying all compensation as deductible, or causing all compensation expenses to be accounted for in a particular fashion.

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, there is no longer an exception to the deductibility limit for qualifying “performance-based compensation” unless the compensation qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. In addition, the deductibility limit may also apply to any compensation paid by Evercore LP to Evercore’s covered employees, but only to the extent of Evercore’s allocable share of the otherwise deductible compensation paid by Evercore LP. Thus, if Evercore LP pays any compensation to Evercore’s covered employees, Evercore may be required to aggregate its allocable share of Evercore LP’s deduction for compensation paid to such covered employees with the deduction for compensation paid by Evercore when applying the deductible limit and if such limit is exceeded, Evercore would lose the excess deduction. The Compensation Committee continues to evaluate the changes to Section 162(m) and retains the ability to award compensation that is not fully tax deductible, or to revise our compensation programs in order to achieve tax efficiencies, in its discretion, in order to provide compensation consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.

2022 Say on Pay Vote

Historically, our shareholders have supported our overall executive compensation program. Our executive compensation program has not changed in any material way since last year, when our shareholders supported our Say on Pay proposal at approximately the 92% level. We believe this overwhelming support is due to the Company’s consistently strong business performance, a close alignment between performance and pay, our extensive shareholder engagement process and disclosure regarding our executive compensation program.

48

Shareholder Engagement and Feedback

As we have done in the past, in 2022 we engaged in extensive shareholder outreach. In our meetings and other engagement with shareholders, we primarily discussed feedback on our executive compensation program, financial performance, corporate governance initiatives, use of equity compensation, sustainability and other matters. The feedback we received from our shareholders included the following, which informed Board actions throughout the course of the year:

During our shareholder outreach in 2022, our shareholders were interested in discussing our broad-based equity compensation program and understanding the purpose and mechanics of our anti-dilutive actions, including our share repurchase program. In particular, our shareholders were focused on the rationale for our use of equity compensation and why our program differs from that of many other similarly sized publicly traded financial services companies. Our shareholders were also interested in understanding more about the firm’s efforts to address key sustainability and ESG matters, such as diversity, equity and inclusion. We are committed to improving our disclosure regarding our sustainability efforts, including the firm’s commitment to promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. We encourage our shareholders to read our upcoming 2023 Sustainability Report regarding our efforts on these matters, which builds on our previous reports in 2022 and 2021.

49

Summary Compensation Table

50

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2022

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

51

Options Exercised and Stock Vested in 2022

Although we have had the authority to issue stock options since our IPO, we have not done so. Accordingly, the table below is with respect to the vesting of RSUs, including dividend equivalent RSUs, and other stock-based awards.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2022

Generally, we provide SMDs (other than our NEOs) an election to receive a portion of their deferred incentive compensation in the form of deferred cash rather than RSUs, which have a similar four-year vesting schedule to RSUs. Deferred cash is credited under this arrangement when annual bonuses are declared (generally, in February of the year following the year to which the bonus relates). Pending distribution, these deferred cash amounts are notionally invested in one or more registered mutual funds or fixed income options selected by the executive from a list of funds established by us. For more information, please see the information described in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. There were no deferred cash awards granted to any NEOs for 2022 performance.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

The following table describes the potential incremental payments and benefits to which our NEOs would be entitled upon termination of employment or a change in control. All calculations in this table

52

are based on an assumed termination date of December 31, 2022 and the completion of a full fiscal year, and all defined terms are as defined in the respective employment agreements of each NEO, which are summarized below under “ —Employment Agreements and Awards.”

The amounts shown in the table below do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment, such as continuation of health care benefits through the end of the month of the termination of employment. While our NEOs’ rights in respect of RSUs granted in connection with bonuses and deferred cash awards are subject to continued vesting upon a qualifying retirement, as described above, none of our NEOs have satisfied the advance notice required for such qualifying retirement as of December 31, 2022. Accordingly, none of our NEOs would have been eligible for this benefit as of December 31, 2022 and this benefit is therefore not illustrated in the table below for those awards.

53

Employment Agreements and Awards

Our Rationale for Agreements that Provide for Payments to Executives upon the Occurrence of Specified Events

The employment agreements we entered into with some of our NEOs provide for severance payments. In addition, some of those agreements provide for additional payments in connection with a change in control or a termination that occurs after a change in control (including, for Mr. Altman, a payment to compensate him for excise taxes that could arise in such circumstances). In December 2019, we confirmed our agreement to pay each of our NEOs their current base salaries during their employment with the Company.

We believe that these severance and change in control arrangements mitigate some of the risk that exists for executives working in a public company, while also appropriately balancing incentives and providing certainty to our executives, and, for Mr. Altman, will make him whole in the case of any potential tax penalty in connection with a change of control. In addition, due to the fact that there has historically been significant acquisition activity in the financial services industry, there is a possibility that we could be acquired in the future. Accordingly, we believe that severance and change in control arrangements are necessary to enable key executives to evaluate objectively the benefits to our shareholders of a proposed transaction, notwithstanding its potential effects on their own job security.

54

Employment Agreement with Mr. Altman

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Altman’s employment agreement, Mr. Altman will have automatic, successive one-year extensions of his employment expiring on August 10 of the relevant year, unless either party gives the other 60 days’ prior notice that the term will not be extended.

Mr. Altman’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $500,000, and an annual bonus as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. According to Mr. Altman’s employment agreement, up to 50% of the annual bonus payable to him may be payable in the form of our restricted securities, with such restricted securities vesting in four equal annual installments (or at such faster rate and subject to acceleration upon certain specified events as may be applicable to restricted securities issued in the same fiscal year to our other SMDs).

Pursuant to his employment agreement, if Mr. Altman’s employment terminates prior to the expiration of the term due to his death or disability, he would be entitled to receive (1) any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination; (2) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses properly incurred by him; (3) such employee benefits, if any, to which he may be entitled under our employee benefit plans (the payments and benefits described in (1) through (3) are referred to as the “accrued rights”); (4) lump sum payments equal to his earned but unpaid annual bonus, if any, payable in respect of the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, to be paid when such bonus would have otherwise been payable had his employment not terminated; and (5) a pro-rated portion of the annual bonus, calculated based on the number of months (and any fraction thereof) he is employed during the fiscal year in which a termination of employment occurs and in respect of which such bonus is payable, relative to 12 months.

If Mr. Altman’s employment is terminated prior to the expiration of the term (or such extension thereof) by us without “cause” (as defined below) or by him for “good reason” (as defined below) or if we elect not to extend the term (each a “qualifying termination”), he would be entitled, subject to his compliance with specified restrictive covenants, to (A) a lump sum payment equal to two times (three times in the case of a qualifying termination that occurs on or following our “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreement)) the greater of (x) the sum of (1) his annual base salary and (2) his average annual bonus for the three most recently completed fiscal years and (y) the average of the aggregate amount of cash compensation payable to our three most highly paid executives in the most recently completed fiscal year; (B) any “accrued rights” (as defined above); (C) lump sum payments equal to Mr. Altman’s earned but unpaid annual bonus, if any, payable in respect of the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, to be paid when such bonuses would have otherwise been payable had Mr. Altman’s employment not terminated; and (D) a pro-rated portion of the annual bonus, calculated based on the number of months (and any fraction thereof) Mr. Altman is employed during the fiscal year in which a termination of employment occurs and in respect of which such bonus is payable, relative to 12 months. Mr. Altman would also be entitled to receive continued coverage for himself and his spouse and dependents under our medical plans for two years (three years in the case of a qualifying termination that occurs on or following a change in control), subject to payment by him of the same premiums he would have paid during such period of coverage if he were an active employee. Any termination by us without cause within six months prior to the occurrence of a change in control would be deemed to be a termination of employment on the date of such change in control. The severance benefits payable to Mr. Altman are conditioned on his continued compliance with specified confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information covenants following his termination of employment with us. For purposes of Mr. Altman’s employment agreement, “cause” means the occurrence of: (1) Mr. Altman’s breach of a material obligation under the governing documents of our entities, (2) Mr. Altman’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere in respect of, any felony, (3) Mr. Altman’s perpetration of a fraud against us, (4) Mr. Altman’s willful and continued failure to perform his duties to us or (5) any willful misconduct by Mr. Altman which could reasonably have an adverse effect on his ability to function as our employee or on our business or reputation. For purposes of Mr. Altman’s employment agreement, “good reason” means: (1) our failure to pay Mr. Altman’s base salary and annual bonus (if such

55

amounts become payable to Mr. Altman), (2) any diminution in Mr. Altman’s title or authority with us, (3) our failure to provide Mr. Altman with the employee benefits or perquisites provided for in the employment agreement, or (4) the failure to re-elect him as a member of the Board.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Altman’s employment which is not a qualifying termination or a termination due to his death or disability (including if Mr. Altman resigns without good reason), Mr. Altman would be entitled to receive any “accrued rights” (as defined above).

Mr. Altman has also entered into confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreements with us. Pursuant to these agreements, he is subject to a covenant not to (1) compete with us while employed and for 24 months following his termination of employment for any reason and (2) solicit our employees, consultants and certain actual and prospective clients while employed and for 12 months following his termination of employment for any reason, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions.

If a dispute arises out of the employment agreement with Mr. Altman, we would pay his reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with such dispute if he prevails on substantially all issues in dispute.

In addition, if payments or benefits provided to Mr. Altman under an employment agreement or any other plan or agreement in connection with a change in control result in an “excess parachute payment” excise tax being imposed on him, he would be entitled to a gross-up payment equal to the amount of the excise tax, as well as the excise tax and income tax on the gross-up payment.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Weinberg

Mr. Weinberg’s employment agreement provides for a term continuing until March 1, 2023, and annual compensation as follows: (1) an annual base salary in an amount equal to the greater of (x) $500,000 and (y) the then current annual base salary of Mr. Schlosstein, and (2) an annual bonus, with the actual bonus award payable to be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of pre-established performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee, on terms no less favorable than those applicable to Mr. Schlosstein.

Following Mr. Schlosstein’s retirement or termination, Mr. Weinberg’s threshold, target and maximum bonus opportunity shall be no less favorable than as applicable to Mr. Weinberg prior to such retirement or termination, and Mr. Weinberg’s bonus will be determined on a basis no less favorable than that applicable to the other executive officers of the Company. A percentage of Mr. Weinberg’s annual bonus, to be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee (but which percentage shall be the same percentage payable to Mr. Schlosstein or, following Mr. Schlosstein’s retirement, the other executive officers of the Company) will be delivered in the form of deferred compensation.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Weinberg received an initial sign-on restricted cash award with a target payment amount of $35 million, of which $11 million vested on March 1, 2019, $6 million vested on each of March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022, and March 1, 2023, subject to Mr. Weinberg’s continued employment through each such vesting date except as noted below. The Compensation Committee has discretion to increase or decrease the amount payable on each vesting date based on performance criteria to be discussed with Mr. Weinberg and determined by the Compensation Committee at least annually. The Compensation Committee may not, however, without Mr. Weinberg’s consent, increase the amount payable on any applicable vesting date to more than 200% of the target amount or decrease the amount payable by more than 25% of the target amount. The Compensation Committee determined not to increase or decrease the $11 million that vested on March 1, 2019, the $6 million that vested on March 1, 2020, the $6 million that vested on March 1, 2021, the $6 million that vested on March 1, 2022, or the $6 million that vested on March 1, 2023. In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the 2016 Plan), the initial cash award would have vested in full at the target payment amount.

56

In addition to the foregoing, Mr. Weinberg will be entitled to participate in all Company employee benefit programs on terms no less favorable than those generally provided to Mr. Schlosstein (or, following Mr. Schlosstein’s retirement, other executive officers of the Company).

The employment agreement further provides that if Mr. Weinberg’s employment is terminated by us without “cause,” by Mr. Weinberg for “good reason” or as a result of death or “disability” (each as defined in the employment agreement), then, subject to his execution, delivery and non-revocation of a release of claims with respect to the Company and its affiliates, Mr. Weinberg will be entitled to receive, in addition to certain accrued rights, (i) to the extent not already vested, full vesting of his initial RSU award (the final tranche of which vested by their terms in 2022, as described below); (ii) to the extent not already vested and paid, full vesting of his initial cash award, paid in accordance with the original payment schedule with the Company to determine in good faith the amounts payable pursuant to the initial cash award based on the performance criteria established with respect to each vesting tranche (the final tranche of which vested and paid by its terms in March 2023); and (iii) full satisfaction of the service vesting condition applicable to his Class I-P units, with the Class I-P units remaining outstanding for one year, during which time the applicable performance vesting conditions may be satisfied (the Class I-P units fully vested by their terms in 2022). In addition, Mr. Weinberg is entitled to receive his annual bonus for any completed fiscal year preceding the termination date, provided that the Company may issue up to 50% of such amount in shares of fully-vested Class A common stock.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Mr. Weinberg retires and satisfies the six month prior written notice requirement associated with retirement eligibility in this case, Mr. Weinberg will be deemed to have satisfied the service requirements necessary for full vesting of the initial cash award, and Mr. Weinberg is entitled to be paid the relevant cash amounts (to be determined in good faith by the Company based on the performance criteria established with respect to each vesting tranche) in accordance with the original payment schedule. Further, if Mr. Weinberg retires on or following January 15, 2022 and satisfies the one year prior written notice requirement associated with retirement eligibility in this case, Mr. Weinberg will be deemed to have satisfied the age and service requirements necessary for full vesting of all deferred compensation and then-unvested equity awards (including equity awards granted to Mr. Weinberg in respect of his annual bonuses, if any, and his initial RSU award and Class I-P units), with such deferred compensation and equity awards generally to be paid out or settled, as applicable, in accordance with the original payment or vesting schedule. The right to receive the initial cash award, deferred compensation and equity awards following retirement is subject to continued compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth in his restrictive covenant agreement (as described below), regardless of whether the applicable time limits have otherwise expired.

In connection with the employment agreement, Mr. Weinberg also entered into a confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Weinberg is subject to a covenant not to (i) compete with the Company or its affiliates while employed and for 12 months following his termination of employment for any reason and (ii) solicit our employees, consultants and certain actual and prospective clients while employed and for 12 months following his termination of employment for any reason, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions. This agreement also contains a covenant not to disclose confidential information and an assignment of property rights provision.

Special One-Time Equity and Partnership Unit Awards to Mr. Weinberg

The Company granted 900,000 RSUs to Mr. Weinberg in connection with his appointment as the Company’s Executive Chairman in 2016. This one-time grant of RSUs is subject to the terms of the RSU award agreement entered into on November 15, 2016 with Mr. Weinberg and are generally governed by terms and conditions identical to those of the 2016 Plan (to the extent such terms and conditions do not conflict with the RSU award agreement). Subject to Mr. Weinberg remaining in continuous service with the Company through the applicable vesting date, the RSUs vested 18% on December 31, 2016, 14% on each of the first four anniversaries of March 1, 2017, and 26% on March 1, 2022. The RSUs were entitled to dividend equivalent

57

rights or accrued cash dividends on such awards, which were subject to the same terms and conditions (including the same vesting and delivery schedule) as the underlying RSUs. The RSUs were awarded outside the 2016 Plan in reliance on the employment inducement exception provided under Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.

In addition, on November 15, 2016, the Company, Evercore LP and Mr. Weinberg entered into an incentive subscription agreement pursuant to which Mr. Weinberg subscribed for a one-time grant of 400,000 Class I-P units, which are structured as “profits interests” under applicable tax rules, and one share of Class B common stock of the Company, which share will entitle Mr. Weinberg to one vote for each partnership unit then held by Mr. Weinberg. The Class I-P units converted into a specified number of Class I units upon satisfaction of both service vesting conditions and performance vesting conditions. The service vesting conditions were satisfied upon Mr. Weinberg remaining a full-time employee in good standing through March 1, 2022. The Class I-P units were also subject to the following performance vesting conditions, which were satisfied when the average of the high and low price of the Company’s Class A common stock on a trading day met or exceeded the following thresholds:

The Class I-P units were awarded outside any shareholder approved equity-compensation plan in reliance on the employment inducement exception described above.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Schlosstein

Mr. Schlosstein’s employment agreement with us ended in accordance with its terms on May 21, 2014. Mr. Schlosstein continues to be employed by us as an at-will employee as Chairman Emeritus (a non-Board position).

In connection with his employment agreement, Mr. Schlosstein also entered into a confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with us that remains in effect. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Schlosstein is subject to a covenant not to (1) compete with us while employed and for 12 months following his termination of employment for any reason and (2) solicit our employees, consultants and certain actual and prospective clients while employed and for 12 months following his termination of employment for any reason, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a termination of Mr. Schlosstein’s employment without cause or for good reason, the non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions would have only applied for six months and only if we elected to pay Mr. Schlosstein’s base salary and provided continued medical plan coverage during such period.

In addition, if a dispute arises out of the employment agreement with Mr. Schlosstein, we would pay Mr. Schlosstein’s reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with such dispute if he prevails in substantially all material respects on the issues presented for resolution.

Agreements with Ms. Mellet

We entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Mellet on May 26, 2021. Ms. Mellet’s employment agreement provided for her to serve as the CFO and Senior Managing Director commencing September 1, 2021 and as a Senior Managing Director from her start date on July 1, 2021 through the commencement of her CFO role. The employment agreement provided for annual compensation as follows: (1) an annual base salary in an amount equal to $500,000, (2) an annual incentive bonus for each of 2021 and 2022 with a minimum of $3.75 million, no less than 50% of which was payable in cash, subject to continued employment through the payment date except as noted below. Pursuant to her employment agreement,

58

Ms. Mellet received a special, one-time grant of a restricted cash award with a target value of $2.6 million, which was scheduled to vest on each of the first four anniversaries of July 6, 2021, subject to Ms. Mellet’s continued employment through each such vesting date except as noted below. In the event that Ms. Mellet forfeited more than $600,000 in deferred compensation from her previous employer, Ms. Mellet would have received an additional grant with a value equal to the excess.

In addition to the foregoing, Ms. Mellet was entitled to reimbursement of certain reasonable expenses and will be entitled to participate in all Company employee benefit programs.

The employment agreement further provided that if Ms. Mellet’s employment was terminated by us without “cause,” by Ms. Mellet for “good reason” or as a result of death or “disability” (each as defined in the employment agreement), then, subject to her execution, delivery and non-revocation of a release of claims with respect to the Company and its affiliates, Ms. Mellet would be entitled to receive, in addition to certain accrued rights, (i) any unpaid portion of her 2021 annual incentive bonus and 2022 annual incentive bonus; and (ii) to the extent not already vested, full vesting of her initial RSU award and any RSUs granted in satisfaction of any portion of her 2021 annual incentive bonus and 2022 annual incentive bonus.

In connection with the employment agreement, Ms. Mellet also entered into a confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this agreement, Ms. Mellet is subject to a covenant not to (1) compete with us while employed and (2) solicit our employees and consultants for 12 months, and certain actual and prospective clients while employed and for six months, following termination of employment for any reason, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions.

We did not enter into any additional agreements with Ms. Mellet in connection with her resignation, and her confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with the Company continued to apply by its terms.

Agreements with Mr. Hyman

We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hyman on August 3, 2014, the initial term of which expired on October 31, 2019. Mr. Hyman continues to be employed by us as an at-will employee.

In connection with his employment agreement, Mr. Hyman also entered into a confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with us that remains in effect. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Hyman is subject to a covenant not to (1) compete with us while employed and, if terminated for any reason other than death, a termination without cause or as a result of a resignation for good reason, for 24 months following his termination of employment (the “Restricted Period”) and (2) solicit our employees, consultants and certain actual and prospective clients during the Restricted Period, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions.

Agreement with Mr. Klurfeld

Mr. Klurfeld is employed by us as an at-will employee. Mr. Klurfeld entered into a confidentiality, non-solicitation and proprietary information agreement with us that remains in effect. Pursuant to his agreement, Mr. Klurfeld is subject to a covenant not to (1) compete with us while employed and (2) solicit our employees and consultants for 12 months, and certain actual and prospective clients while employed and for six months, following termination of employment for any reason, in each case, subject to certain specified exclusions.

Deferred Cash and Incentive Deferred Cash Awards to Mr. Klurfeld

Generally, we provide SMDs (other than our NEOs) an election to receive a portion of their deferred incentive compensation in the form of deferred cash rather than RSUs, as described above under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2020.”

59

Prior to becoming an NEO, Mr. Klurfeld elected to receive a portion of his deferred incentive compensation in respect of 2017 performance in the form of deferred cash rather than RSUs. Deferred cash in the amount of $122,500 was credited to him under this arrangement in February 2018 and, pending distribution, is notionally invested in one or more registered mutual funds or fixed income options. Mr. Klurfeld’s deferred cash award vests as follows, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date: 25% of the then-current account balance vested on February 4, 2019; 33% of the then-current account balance vested on February 4, 2020; 50% of the then-current account balance vested on February 4, 2021; and 100% of the then-current account balance vested on February 4, 2022. Any unvested portion of the then-current account balance would have vested in full upon a change in control, Mr. Klurfeld’s death or disability, termination without cause (subject to execution of a release) or eligibility for qualifying retirement. Distributions generally occur within 30 days following the applicable vesting date.

In addition, in connection with his appointment as General Counsel, Mr. Klurfeld was granted an incentive deferred cash award in February 2018 in the amount of $1.5 million. The incentive deferred cash award vests as follows, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date: $210,000 vested on February 13, 2022; $210,000 vested on February 13, 2023; $210,000 will vest on each of February 13, 2024 through 2026; and $225,000 will vest on each of February 13, 2027 and 2028. Any unvested portion of the incentive deferred cash award will vest in full upon a change in control, Mr. Klurfeld’s death or disability or termination without cause (subject, in the case of death, disability or termination without cause, to execution of a release). Distributions generally occur within two and a half months following the applicable vesting date.

Mr. Klurfeld’s deferred cash and incentive deferred cash awards will be reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the years earned.

Evercore Annual Equity Awards

Our RSUs granted in connection with annual incentive awards vest in substantially equal annual installments over four years, subject to accelerated vesting upon death, disability, change in control, qualifying retirement or termination without cause. When deferred compensation is awarded in the form of RSUs, the RSUs include dividend equivalent rights payable in the form of cash or additional RSUs, at the Company’s election, which will vest and be settled on the same terms as the original RSUs to which they relate.

The RSUs will continue to have the underlying stock distributed (or released from restriction) on the original vesting schedule following a qualifying retirement as long as the recipient complies with his or her non-competition commitments, gives the minimum advanced notice of his or her decision to retire, which is generally six months to one year, and, at the time of retirement, (i) (a) is at least 55 years old and has completed at least five years of continuous service with the Company and (b) his or her age plus years of service exceeds 65 or (ii) is at least 60 years old and has completed at least 10 years of continuous service with the Company. If a qualified retiree violates his or her non-competition commitments at any time before a scheduled release date, the undelivered shares will be forfeited. Because the general vesting period of these awards is four years, this will provide an incentive for qualified retirees to refrain from competition or client solicitation for up to four years.

The vesting of deferred compensation awards is also subject to accelerated vesting upon a termination of the recipient’s service by us without “cause,” subject to his or her execution of a general release of claims against us and our affiliates. For this purpose, “cause” for U.S. partners and employees generally means (1) the employee’s material breach of any restrictive covenants or any of our published policies (including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics); (2) any act or omission by the employee that causes us or the employee to be subject to discipline under any law, rule or regulation related to our business, or any rule of any exchange or association of which we are a member; (3) the employee’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, any felony; (4) the employee’s participation in any fraud or embezzlement; (5) gross negligence or willful misconduct by the employee in the course of employment or the employee’s deliberate and continuous disregard of his or her material duties; or (6) the employee’s commission of any act or making of any statement

60

that impairs, impugns, denigrates, disparages or otherwise negatively reflects on us or our reputation or business interests. For non-U.S. partners and employees, the cause definition is substantively similar. The RSUs are subject to the terms of our clawback policy and our anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.

Evercore LP Class L Interest Subscription Agreements

In April 2021 and December 2021, the Compensation Committee issued Class L Interests in Evercore LP, to each of the named executive officers other than Ms. Mellet pursuant to a subscription agreement. The Class L Interests granted in December 2021 entitled the applicable named executive officers to a discretionary distribution of profits from Evercore LP in the first quarter of 2023, and were subject to a maximum amount equal to a specified percentage of 2022 “adjusted operating income,” as defined in the subscription agreements, which in the case of (i) Messrs. Altman, Weinberg and Schlosstein was 1.50%, (ii) Mr. Hyman was 0.65%, and (iii) Mr. Klurfeld was 0.30%.

The Class L Interests and any distributions thereon, are subject to the Company’s clawback policies as in effect from time to time and compliance with the restrictive covenant agreements applicable to the named executive officer. In addition, the Class L Interests are cancelled in the event the employment of the named executive officer is terminated for any reason prior to the date of the distribution, and will otherwise be cancelled immediately following the distribution. The Committee anticipates it will cause the issuance of Class L Interests to named executive officers for subsequent years on substantially similar terms.

61

PAY RATIO

Set forth below is the annual total compensation of our median employee, the annual total compensation of each of Messrs. Weinberg and Schlosstein, and the ratio of those values:

Background

To identify our median employee, we used our entire employee population, excluding independent contractors and consultants, as of November 1, 2020 and measured compensation based on total pay (including the value of equity awards received in 2020, cash bonus, overtime pay, commissions and pensions) actually received over the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. The original median employee left the company during 2021. As permitted by SEC rules, the median employee selected for 2021 was and for 2022 is an employee whose compensation was substantially similar to the compensation of the original median employee identified in 2020, and was identified based on the compensation measure used to select the original median employee. There has been no change in our employee population, our employee compensation arrangements or our median employee’s circumstances that we believe would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure, other than Mr. Schlosstein’s transition from Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-CEO to Chairman Emeritus.

As required by SEC rules, after determining that our median employee (who is located in the U.S.) will be the median employee for purposes of this pay ratio, we calculated 2022 annual total compensation for both our median employee and Messrs. Weinberg and Schlosstein using the same methodology that we use to determine our named executive officers’ annual total compensation for the Summary Compensation Table.

The pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll, employment records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt various methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

62